Technical Audit
Stop guessing what's wrong with your website. Performance, security, SEO infrastructure, AI-readiness, and a prioritized fix list you can execute with us or anyone else.
Consulting & audits
Senior engineering judgment without hiring a senior engineer. Fixed-fee audits with a report you can act on, one-hour strategy sessions with a documented plan, and fractional CTO work when the decisions get bigger than the website.
how engagements grow
most engagements start as an hour that found a bigger problem
TL;DR
Breezy Sites consulting starts at two fixed prices: a $795 Technical Audit covering performance, security, SEO infrastructure, and AI-readiness with a prioritized fix list, and a $150–$250 Strategy Hour that ends in a documented action plan. Bigger engagements, from fractional CTO advisory to custom application development, are quoted from there.
You bring the problem; you leave with a documented plan. A Strategy Hour is one hour with a senior engineer on your actual stack: migration fears, a broken deploy, a platform decision, an estimate you don't trust. We put the plan in writing so you can act on it with or without us.
One hour with a senior engineer beats a month of forum threads.
Bring your stack questions, migration fears, or broken deploy. Leave with a documented action plan.
A fractional CTO gives you executive-level technology leadership part time: architecture ownership, vendor and build-versus-buy decisions, and translating technical risk into business terms. It fits businesses whose technology outgrew their team but not their budget; the market runs $150 to $500 an hour, and most engagements here start as a Strategy Hour that uncovered a bigger problem. Quoted per engagement by involvement level and length.
We design, build, and then own bespoke business applications: membership systems, booking and scheduling engines, reporting platforms, integrations no plugin can do. That includes taking over legacy PHP and CodeIgniter applications whose original developers are gone. The team has run one client's application portfolio continuously for 13 years, spanning more than 25 production applications, with several other client relationships past the six-year mark. Quoted by scope, integrations, and support tenure; long-term support retainers follow the build.
Infrastructure advisory covers AWS: EC2, RDS, S3, Route 53, load balancing, and disaster recovery, with migration execution handled by the migrations team.
One client, ongoing
Yes, that's the point of it. The $795 audit report is written to be executed by anyone competent: findings, priorities, and concrete fixes, not a sales document. Some clients hire us for the fixes; some take the report to their existing developer. Both outcomes are fine, and the audit fee credits toward a sprint if you stay.
Stop guessing what's wrong with your website.
Fixed-fee Technical Audit: performance, security, SEO infrastructure, AI-readiness, and a prioritized fix list you can execute with us or anyone else.
Stop guessing what's wrong with your website. Performance, security, SEO infrastructure, AI-readiness, and a prioritized fix list you can execute with us or anyone else.
One hour with a senior engineer beats a month of forum threads. Bring your stack questions, migration fears, or broken deploy. Leave with a documented action plan.
Evidence-graded audits of how ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews actually see your site, documented crawler behavior, not agency folklore.
Going deeper
A sales call exists to sell you something, so the advice bends toward the sale. A paid hour removes that incentive: you get a senior engineer's honest read on your situation and a written plan, even when the plan is "don't hire anyone, do these two things yourself."
Yes. It's written as an execution document: findings, priorities, concrete fixes. No proprietary jargon, no dependency on hiring us. If you do proceed with us, the $795 credits toward the sprint.
If the audit leads to a fixed-fee sprint with us, the $795 you already paid comes off the sprint price. You never pay for the diagnosis twice.
Yes. Bespoke business applications are quoted by scope, and support retainers follow the build. We're also one of the few teams that will take ownership of an existing legacy application rather than insisting on a rewrite.
Yes, and we usually recommend stabilizing before rewriting. We inventory the code, document what exists, fix what's fragile, and then maintain it. Rewrites happen when the evidence says so, not as a default.
Yes. Platform-agnostic is the point: we run WordPress, Webflow, Shopify, Next.js, Astro, and custom stacks daily, so the recommendation follows your requirements rather than our comfort zone.
Every finding gets stated as what it costs or risks: revenue, downtime, security exposure, or future rework. Executives shouldn't need to parse a dependency graph to make a budget decision, and our reports don't ask them to.
Then the hour becomes the scoping session. You'll leave with a plan that includes what a longer engagement would cover and cost, quoted in writing. Plenty of problems really do fit in an hour, though.
